Human-Computer Interaction and Visualization
HCI researchers at Google have enormous potential to impact the experience of Google users as well as conduct innovative research. Grounded in user behavior understanding and real use, Google’s HCI researchers invent, design, build and trial large-scale interactive systems in the real world. We declare success only when we positively impact our users and user communities, often through new and improved Google products. HCI research has fundamentally contributed to the design of Search, Gmail, Docs, Maps, Chrome, Android, YouTube, serving over a billion daily users. We are engaged in a variety of HCI disciplines such as predictive and intelligent user interface technologies and software, mobile and ubiquitous computing, social and collaborative computing, interactive visualization and visual analytics. Many projects heavily incorporate machine learning with HCI, and current projects include predictive user interfaces; recommenders for content, apps, and activities; smart input and prediction of text on mobile devices; user engagement analytics; user interface development tools; and interactive visualization of complex data.
Recent Publications
Preview abstract
Generative AI’s humanlike qualities are driving its rapid adoption in professional domains. However, this anthropomorphic appeal raises concerns from HCI and responsible AI scholars about potential hazards and harms, such as overtrust in system outputs. To investigate how technology workers navigate these humanlike qualities and anticipate emergent harms, we conducted focus groups with 30 professionals across six job functions (ML engineering, product policy, UX research and design, product management, technology writing, and communications). Our findings reveal an unsettled knowledge environment surrounding humanlike generative AI, where workers’ varying perspectives illuminate a range of potential risks for individuals, knowledge work fields, and society. We argue that workers require comprehensive support, including clearer conceptions of “humanlikeness” to effectively mitigate these risks. To aid in mitigation strategies, we provide a conceptual map articulating the identified hazards and their connection to conflated notions of “humanlikeness.”
View details
Preview abstract
Modern user interfaces are complex composites, with elements originating from various sources, such as the operating system, apps, a web browser, or websites. Many security and privacy models implicitly depend on users correctly identifying an element's source, a concept we term ''surface attribution.'' Through two large-scale vignette-based surveys (N=4,400 and N=3,057), we present the first empirical measurement of this ability.
We find that users struggle, correctly attributing UI source only 55% of the time on desktop and 53% on mobile. Familiarity and strong brand cues significantly improve accuracy, whereas UI positioning, a long-held security design concept especially for browsers, has minimal impact. Furthermore, simply adding a ''Security & Privacy'' brand cue to Android permission prompts failed to improve attribution. These findings demonstrate a fundamental gap in users' mental models, indicating that relying on them to distinguish trusted UI is a fragile security paradigm.
View details
Preview abstract
The field of Human-Computer Interaction is approaching a critical inflection point, moving beyond the era of static, deterministic systems into a new age of self-evolving systems. We introduce the concept of Adaptive generative interfaces that move beyond static artifacts to autonomously expand their own feature sets at runtime. Rather than relying on fixed layouts, these systems utilize generative methods to morph and grow in real-time based on a user’s immediate intent. The system operates through three core mechanisms: Directed synthesis (generating new features from direct commands), Inferred synthesis (generating new features for unmet needs via inferred commands), and Real-time adaptation (dynamically restructuring the interface's visual and functional properties at runtime). To empirically validate this paradigm, we executed a within-subject (repeated measures) comparative study (N=72) utilizing 'Penny,' a digital banking prototype. The experimental design employed a counterbalanced Latin Square approach to mitigate order effects, such as learning bias and fatigue, while comparing Deterministic interfaces baseline against an Adaptive generative interfaces. Participant performance was verified through objective screen-capture evidence, with perceived usability quantified using the industry-standard System Usability Scale (SUS). The results demonstrated a profound shift in user experience: the Adaptive generative version achieved a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 84.38 ('Excellent'), significantly outperforming the Deterministic version’s score of 53.96 ('Poor'). With a statistically significant mean difference of 30.42 points (p < 0.0001) and a large effect size (d=1.04), these findings confirm that reducing 'navigation tax' through adaptive generative interfaces directly correlates with a substantial increase in perceived usability. We conclude that deterministic interfaces are no longer sufficient to manage the complexity of modern workflows. The future of software lies not in a fixed set of pre-shipped features, but in dynamic capability sets that grow, adapt, and restructure themselves in real-time to meet the specific intent of the user. This paradigm shift necessitates a fundamental transformation in product development, requiring designers to transcend traditional, linear workflows and evolve into 'System Builders'—architects of the design principles and rules that facilitate this new age of self-evolving software.
View details
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Benjamin Hersh
Nels Numan
Jiahao Ren
Xingyue Chen
Robert Timothy Bettridge
Faraz Faruqi
Anthony 'Xiang' Chen
Steve Toh
Google XR, Google (2026)
Preview abstract
While large language models have accelerated software development through "vibe coding", prototyping intelligent Extended Reality (XR) experiences remains inaccessible due to the friction of complex game engines and low-level sensor integration. To bridge this gap, we contribute XR Blocks, an open-source, modular WebXR framework that abstracts spatial computing complexities into high-level, human-centered primitives. Building upon this foundation, we present Vibe Coding XR, an end-to-end rapid prototyping workflow that leverages LLMs to translate natural language intent directly into functional XR software. Using a web-based interface, creators can transform high-level prompts (e.g., "create a dandelion that reacts to hand") into interactive WebXR applications in under a minute. We provide a preliminary technical evaluation on a pilot dataset (VCXR60) alongside diverse application scenarios highlighting mixed-reality realism, multi-modal interaction, and generative AI integrations. By democratizing spatial software creation, this work empowers practitioners to bypass low-level hurdles and rapidly move from "idea to reality." Code and live demos are available at https://xrblocks.github.io/gem and https://github.com/google/xrblocks.
View details
Preview abstract
Audio Description ( AD) provides essential access to visual media for blind and low vision ( BLV) audiences. Yet current AD production tools remain largely inaccessible to BLV video creators, who possess valuable expertise but face barriers due to visually- driven interfaces. We present ADCanvas, a multimodal authoring system that supports non- visual control
over audio description ( AD) creation. ADCanvas combines conversational interaction with keyboard- based playback control and a plain- text, screen reader–
accessible editor to support end- to- end AD authoring and visual question answering ( VQA). Combining screen- reader- friendly controls with a multimodal
LLM agent, ADCanvas supports live VQA, script generation, and AD modification. Through a user study with 12 BLV video creators, we find that users adopt
the conversational agent as an informational aide and drafting assistant, while maintaining agency through verification and editing. For example, participants
saw themselves as curators who received information from the model and filtered it down for their audience. Our findings offer design implications for
accessible media tools, including precise editing controls, accessibility support for creative ideation, and configurable rules for human- AI collaboration.
View details
Who is At-Risk? Surveying the Prevalence of Risk Factors and Tech-Facilitated Attacks in the United States
Sharon Heung
Claire Weizenegger
Mo Houtti
Tara Matthews
Ashley Walker
2026
Preview abstract
A growing body of qualitative research has identified contextual risk factors that elevate people’s chances of experiencing digital-safety attacks. However, the lack of quantitative data on the population level distribution of these risk factors prevents policymakers and tech companies from developing targeted, evidence-based interventions to improve digital safety. To address this gap, we surveyed 5,001 adults in the United States to analyze: (1) the frequency of and relationship between digital-safety attacks (e.g., scams, harassment, account hacking), and (2) how these attacks align with 10 contextual risk factors. Nearly half of our respondents identify as resource constrained, which significantly correlates with higher likelihood of experiencing four common attacks. We also present qualitative insights to expand our understanding of the factors beyond the existing literature (e.g., “prominence” included high-visibility roles in local communities). This study provides the first large-scale quantitative analysis correlating digital-safety attacks with contextual risk factors and demographics.
View details
×
![]()